Why you may belief TechRadar
We spend hours testing each services or products we assessment, so that you may be certain you’re shopping for the very best. Find out more about how we test.
Editor’s Notice
• Authentic assessment date: April 2023
• Launch value: MSRP at $599 / £589 / AU$1,109
• Lowest value now: $792.99 / £485.28 / AU$899
Replace – April 2025: With the discharge of the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070, you’d hope that it will power the value of the RTX 4070, one of many best graphics cards of the final technology, down considerably, however that does not look like the case within the US (UK and Australian consumers can truly discover this card for lower than RRP proper now).
With the lowest value I’ve discovered for the RTX 4070 is within the US, coming in at slightly below $800, it is a a lot tougher card to advocate in 2025, particularly with AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT playing cards promoting for a lot much less and rather more available on-line.
Authentic unedited assessment follows…
John Loeffler
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070: Two-minute assessment
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 is right here in the end, and for avid gamers who’ve been starved for an improve, go forward and choose this one up. It could do nearly every little thing.
It is onerous to observe up the RTX 3070, one of many best graphics cards of all time, and in our Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 review, we praised that card for being an excellent performer at 1080p and 1440p — which is the place the overwhelming variety of PC avid gamers recreation at — whereas additionally being a way more reasonably priced choice over the opposite two launch playing cards for Nvidia’s Ampere lineup. We particularly famous how the RTX 3070 supplied comparable efficiency to the RTX 2080 Ti for half the value.
Every thing we mentioned in regards to the RTX 3070 applies simply as simply to the RTX 4070, solely now it would not simply dabble in 4K; it will possibly competently recreation at each decision, making it a graphics card that everyone can fall in love with with out spending a fortune.
Lots has modified because the RTX 3070 launched in direction of the tip of 2020, and sadly, not every little thing modified for the higher. Issues are dearer just about in every single place you look, and the Nvidia RTX 4070 is not immune. At $599 (about £510 / AU$870), the RTX 4070 is totally 20% dearer than the RTX 3070 was at launch.
I am not pleased about this in any respect, and also you should not be both, however all it’s important to do is take a look at the scores the RTX 4070 places up on the board and you will be as onerous pressed as I’m to dock it any factors for this. It persistently places out RTX 3080-level efficiency kind of throughout the board and even manages to bloddy the nostril of the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, and whereas the RTX 3080 beats out the RTX 4070 at native 4K, activate DLSS and the RTX 3080 merely will get blown out.
On the opposite aspect of the aisle, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is Group Crimson’s nearest actual competitors, and it struggles to justify itself within the presence of the RTX 4070. Whereas the RX 7900 XT solidly outperforms the 4070, it is also 50% dearer, and the advantages of the RX 7900 XT get rapidly drowned out by the ability of DLSS, particularly in titles with DLSS 3.
Furthermore, the RTX 4070 makes for a reasonably competent creator GPU, providing indie builders and artists who do not have the funding to get themselves an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 a useful choice for getting some work finished inside a extra restricted price range. It isn’t going to energy a serious film studio or something, however should you’re dabbling in 3D modeling or video enhancing, this card is nice compromise between value and efficiency.
Lastly, wrap this all right into a bundle that looks like a downright regular graphics card from ye olden days, again earlier than you wanted to incorporate assist brackets and balast to maintain your gaming PC from tipping over, and you find yourself with a graphics card that may simply energy a number of the best gaming PCs that may truly match into your PC case and your price range.
This graphics card has its points, which is inevitable, however given what’s on supply right here, it is simple sufficient to look previous its shortcomings and revel in some actually excellent efficiency at at an inexpensive sufficient value.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 assessment: Worth & availability
- How a lot is it? $599 (about £510 / AU$870)
- When is it out? April 13, 2023
- Third-party playing cards retail costs will match or exceed Nvidia’s MSRP
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 is out there beginning April 13, 2023, with an MSRP of $599 (about £510 / AU$870). Third-party companions can have their very own variations of the RTX 4070 that can differ in value, however they are going to at all times have an identical or greater common retail value than the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Founders Version.
Notably, the RTX 4070 is getting a 20% value enhance over the cardboard it is changing, the RTX 3070, which had a launch value of $499 within the US (about £425 / AU$725). Whereas we would have beloved to see the value keep the identical gen-over-gen, this could come as no shock to anybody who has been watching GPU value inflation just lately.
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080, for instance, has a ludicrously excessive MSRP of $1,199 (a roughly 72% soar over the RTX 3080), whereas the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 additionally elevated its value over the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 to $1,599 from the 3090’s $1,499.
In the meantime, we have not seen AMD‘s direct RTX 4070 competitor but, the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, however the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is the closest AMD has this technology with an $899 / £799 (round AU$1,350) MSRP, placing it 50% dearer than the RTX 4070.
This card can be the identical value because the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, for what it is value, and contemplating that the RTX 4070 punches nicely above the 3070 Ti’s efficiency, you do not less than get a greater sense of worth out of this card than something from the final technology.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 assessment: Options & chipset
- DLSS 3 with full Body Technology
- Third-gen Ray Tracing Cores and fourth-gen Tensor Cores
- Decrease TGP than RTX 3070
|
Part |
Nvidia RTX 4070 |
Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti |
Nvidia RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Worth |
$599 (about £510 / AU$870) |
$799 / £799 / AU$1,479 |
$499 (about £425 / AU$725) |
|
GPU |
AD104 |
AD104 |
GA104 |
|
Transistor rely |
35.8 billion |
35.8 billion |
17.4 billion |
|
TGP |
200W |
285W |
220W |
|
CUDA Cores |
5,888 |
7,680 |
5,888 |
|
RT Cores |
46 |
60 |
46 |
|
Tensor Cores |
184 |
240 |
184 |
|
Base Clock |
1,920MHz |
2,310MHz |
1,500MHz |
|
Increase Clock |
2,475MHz |
2,610MHz |
1,725MHz |
|
VRAM |
12GB GDDR6X |
12GB GDDR6X |
8GB GDDR6 |
|
Reminiscence Clock |
1,313MHz |
1,313MHz |
1,750MHz |
|
Bus Measurement |
192-bit |
192-bit |
256-bit |
|
Reminiscence Bandwidth |
504.2 GB/s |
504.2 GB/s |
448.0 GB/s |
The Nvidia RTX 4070 would not change an excessive amount of on paper over its last-gen predecessor, that includes the identical variety of streaming multiprocessors, subsequently the identical variety of CUDA cores (5,888), ray-tracing cores (46), and tensor cores (184).
It does bump up its reminiscence to the quicker GDDR6X and provides a further 50% VRAM for a complete of 12GB. With a 192-bit bus and a reminiscence clock of 1,313MHz, the RTX 4070 has an efficient reminiscence velocity of 21 Gbps, equal to that of the Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti, for a reminiscence bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.
It has a decrease base and enhance frequency than the 4070 Ti, clocking in at 1,920MHz base and a couple of,475MHz enhance (in comparison with 2,310MHz base and a couple of,610MHz enhance for the 4070 Ti), however this can be a substantial bump up from the 1,500MHz base and 1,725MHz enhance frequency of the RTX 3070.
That is owing to the 5nm TSMC course of used to fab the AD104 GPU, in comparison with the Samsung 8nm course of for the RTX 3070’s GA104. These quicker clocks additionally energy next-gen ray tracing and tensor cores, so regardless that there are the identical variety of cores in each the RTX 4070 and the RTX 3070, the RTX 4070’s are each a lot quicker and extra subtle.
Additionally think about Nvidia Lovelace’s DLSS 3 with Body Technology capability, one thing that Nvidia Ampere and Turing playing cards do not have entry to, and what seems to be like two very related playing cards on paper seems to be something however in apply.
Lastly, because of the 5nm course of, Nvidia is ready to squeeze extra efficiency out of much less energy, so the TGP for the RTX 4070 is simply 200W, making it a implausible card for a lower-power, sub-600W construct.
- Options & chipset: 5 / 5
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 assessment: Design
- Identical measurement because the RTX 3070
- 16-pin energy connector
- Identical design as RTX 4090 and RTX 4080
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
Nvidia RTX 4070 |
Nvidia RTX 3070 |
Nvidia RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Slots |
Twin-slot |
Twin-slot |
Triple-slot |
|
Dimensions (L x W x H) |
9.5 x 4.4 x 1.5 ins | 242 x 112 x 38 mm |
9.5 x 4.4 x 1.4 ins | 242 x 112 x 36 mm |
12 x 5.5 x 2.5 ins | 310 x 140 x 39 mm |
|
Weight |
2.25 lbs | 1.02 kg |
2.25 lbs | 1.02 kg |
4.66 lbs | 2.11 kg |
|
Energy |
1 x 16-pin |
1 x 12-pin |
1 x 16-pin |
|
Outputs |
3 x DisplayPort 1.4b, 1 x HDMI 2.1 |
3 x DisplayPort 1.4b, 1 x HDMI 2.1 |
3 x DisplayPort 1.4b, 1 x HDMI 2.1 |
|
Cooling |
Twin-fan |
Twin-fan |
Twin-fan |
With the RTX 4070 Founders Version, Nvidia lastly delivers a next-gen graphics card that may truly slot in your case with out requiring a development winch to carry it in place.
OK, the earlier playing cards weren’t that dangerous, and even on the lowered kind issue and weight, you may nonetheless need to toss a GPU bracket into your case for good measure (there isn’t any hurt in defending your funding, in any case).
Picture 1 of 6
However holding the RTX 4070 in my hand, that is the primary card of this technology that does not really feel like a bit of equipment. Even the extra modestly-sized AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT really feel substantial, whereas the RTX 4070 looks like an old style GeForce graphics card from a pair years again.
The RTX 4070 Founders Version retains the identical fan design because the RTX 4090 and RTX 4080 that preceeded it (a fan on the back and front), however it shrinks every little thing right down to a dual-slot card about two-thirds the dimensions of these monsters. The RTX 4070 additionally options the identical outputs as earlier RTX Lovelace playing cards (so no USB-C out), and a 16-pin energy connector with an included adapter for 2 8-pin results in energy the cardboard.
With a TGP of 200W, Nvidia may theoretically have simply gone with a single 8-pin connector, however Group Inexperienced appears completely dedicated to the 12VHPWR cable, it appears. I will by no means cease complaining about this, however it’s what it’s. In case you have an ATX 3.0 energy provide, you will not want to fret about that, however the remainder of us should cope with extra cable administration.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 assessment: Efficiency
- Phenomenal gaming efficiency
- Can simply push 60 fps in 4K gaming with DLSS
- RTX 3080 efficiency at 60% of the ability
Proper out the gate, let’s simply say that the Nvidia RTX 4070 is the best 1440p graphics card available on the market proper now, and it is prone to stay on the prime of that record for an excellent lengthy whereas.
Its efficiency prowess is not restricted to only 1440p, thoughts you, and once I get into the gaming efficiency, you may see that its 4K gaming potential is thrilling (with caveats), however for starters, we are able to dig into its artificial efficiency in checks like 3DMark to see how the basics stack up.
Common Efficiency
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
3DMark Firestrike |
3DMark Nightraid |
3DMark Speedway |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
54,882 |
184,183 |
5,457 |
|
RX 7900 XT |
67,645 |
211,916 |
5,182 |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
48,057 |
178,883 |
5,249 |
|
RTX 3080 |
44,619 |
179,024 |
4,594 |
|
RTX 4070 |
44,288 |
179,557 |
4,454 |
|
RTX 3070 Ti |
37,217 |
163,120 |
3,728 |
|
RTX 3070 |
34,696 |
154,177 |
3,409 |
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
3DMark Port Royal |
3DMark Time Spy |
3DMark Firestrike Excessive |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
14,256 |
23,018 |
27,223 |
|
RX 7900 XT |
14,047 |
26,260 |
34,356 |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
12,927 |
19,215 |
23,576 |
|
RTX 3080 |
11,583 |
17,638 |
21,659 |
|
RTX 4070 |
11,154 |
17,778 |
21,482 |
|
RTX 3070 Ti |
8,754 |
14,687 |
18,308 |
|
RTX 3070 |
8,269 |
13,496 |
16,844 |
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
3DMark Time Spy Excessive |
3DMark Firestrike Extremely |
3DMark Wildlife Excessive |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
11,091 |
13,568 |
46,251 |
|
RX 7900 XT |
12,811 |
17,370 |
45,772 |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
23,576 |
9,789 |
12,148 |
|
RTX 3080 |
8,780 |
11,005 |
38,073 |
|
RTX 4070 |
8,541 |
10,037 |
36,008 |
|
RTX 3070 Ti |
7,254 |
9,286 |
31,230 |
|
RTX 3070 |
6,632 |
8,605 |
28,322 |
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
3DMark Wildlife Excessive Limitless |
Passmark 3D DirectX |
Common Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
45,991 |
40,610 |
42,411 |
|
RX 7900 XT |
47,500 |
33,328 |
46,926 |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
41,027 |
36,628 |
39,057 |
|
RTX 3080 |
37,242 |
34,957 |
37,197 |
|
RTX 4070 |
35,343 |
34,913 |
36,687 |
|
RTX 3070 Ti |
31,117 |
31,606 |
32,391 |
|
RTX 3070 |
28,217 |
31,063 |
30,339 |
As you may see, the RTX 4070 outperforms the RTX 3070 by about 21% total, whereas underperforming the RTX 3080 by about 1.37%, which is shut sufficient to successfully tie the last-gen 4K powerhouse, and underperforms the RTX 3080 Ti by about 6%. Contemplating that the RTX 3080 Ti’s MSRP is sort of twice that of the RTX 4070, that is an astounding consequence.
The RTX 4070 does lag behind the RTX 4070 Ti and the RX 7900 XT by fairly a bit, averaging about 22% worse efficiency than the RX 7900 XT and about 13.5% worse efficiency than the RTX 4070 Ti. These current-gen playing cards even have considerably higher {hardware}, so this is not surprising.
Artistic Efficiency
On the subject of inventive efficiency, nicely, we’ve a extra restricted dataset to work with since Blender Benchmark 3.5.0 determined it solely needed to check half the playing cards I attempted to run it on (together with failing to run on the RTX 4070), so we’ll have to come back again to that one at a later date as soon as the benchmark is up to date.
Within the meantime, the checks I used to be capable of run actually showcased how nicely the RTX 4070 can deal with inventive workloads. On Adobe Premiere and Adobe Photoshop, the RTX 4070 carried out noticeably higher than the RTX 3080 throughout each apps and fell in very shut behind the RTX 4070 Ti for an total second place end.
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
Adobe Premiere |
Adobe Photoshop |
|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
1,278 |
1,533 |
|
RX 7900 XT |
1,109 |
1,519 |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
1,182 |
1,467 |
|
RTX 3080 |
1,163 |
1,486 |
|
RTX 4070 |
1,210 |
1,521 |
|
RTX 3070 Ti |
1,054 |
1,486 |
|
RTX 3070 |
1,113 |
1,486 |
In lieu of Blender’s Benchmark, V-Ray 5 is a reasonably good stand-in, in addition to a superb benchmark in its personal proper. Right here, the RX 7900 XT would not run, because it would not use CUDA or Nvidia’s RTX, however we are able to see the RTX 4070 coming in a decent runner as much as the RTX 4070 Ti.
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
CUDA |
RTX |
|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
2,351 |
3,131 |
|
RX 7900 XT |
NA |
NA |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
2,082 |
2,867 |
|
RTX 3080 |
1,790 |
2,451 |
|
RTX 4070 |
1,871 |
2,629 |
|
RTX 3070 Ti |
1,510 |
2,017 |
|
RTX 3070 |
1,423 |
1,819 |
Certainly one of my latest favourite workloads, Lumion 12.5, renders an architectural design into both a brief film clip at 1080p or 4K at 60 fps, making it probably the greatest benchmarks for creatives to see how a graphics card handles manufacturing degree workloads fairly than artificial checks.
It requires the identical form of {hardware} as lots of the best PC games with the intention to mild a scene, create life like water results, and reproduce foliage on bushes, and it is the form of real-world benchmark that tells extra in regards to the card than a easy quantity devoid of context.
Contemplating that it will possibly take a five-second, 60 fps film clip an hour to render at manufacturing high quality, I switched issues up a bit and fairly than calculate frames per second, like I do with Handbrake’s encoding check, I exploit frames per hour to present a way of how lengthy a film clip you may produce should you go away the clip to render in a single day (a typical apply).
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
1080p, 1-star high quality |
1080p, 4-star high quality |
4k, 4-star high quality |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
7,796 frames/hr |
962 frames/hr |
373 frames/hr |
|
RX 7900 XT |
5,826 frames/hr |
772 frames/hr |
312 frames/hr |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
6,689 frames/hr |
803 frames/hr |
281 frames/hr |
|
RTX 3080 |
6,337 frames/hr |
724 frames/hr |
179 frames/hr |
|
RTX 4070 |
7,176 frames/hr |
730 frames/hr |
264 frames/hr |
|
RTX 3070 Ti |
5,473 frames/hr |
593 frames/hr |
112 frames/hr |
|
RTX 3070 |
5,210 frames/hr |
555 frames/hr |
99 frames/hr |
Within the case of the RTX 4070, it rendered a five-second film clip at 60 fps at draft (1-star) high quality 13% quicker than the RTX 3080, about 7% quicker than the RTX 3080 Ti, and practically 23% quicker than the RX 7900 XT.
It lagged behind the RTX 4070 Ti, although, by about 8%, a deficit that grew wider at 1080p manufacturing (4-star) high quality, the place the RTX 4070 rendered the film 25% slower than the 4070 Ti and 6.78% slower than the RX 7900 XT.
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
167 frames/sec |
|
RX 7900 XT |
165 frames/sec |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
166 frames/sec |
|
RTX 3080 |
164 frames/sec |
|
RTX 4070 |
170 frames/sec |
|
RTX 3070 Ti |
165 frames/sec |
|
RTX 3070 |
167 frames/sec |
For Handbrake, the RTX 4070 manages to tug out its first clear win on the inventive aspect, although not by an entire lot. Nonetheless, 170 frames per second encoding from 4K to 1080p just isn’t dangerous in any respect.
Total then, the RTX 4070 places in a strong inventive efficiency, besting the RTX 3080, the RX 7900 XT, the RTX 3070 Ti, and the RTX 3070, whereas barely shedding out to the RTX 3080 Ti.
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
1,939 |
|
RX 7900 XT |
1,393 |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
1,699 |
|
RTX 3080 |
1,551 |
|
RTX 4070 |
1,587 |
|
RTX 3070 Ti |
1,311 |
|
RTX 3070 |
1,251 |
Gaming Efficiency
Nearly as good of a inventive card because the RTX 4070 is, in its bones, this can be a avid gamers’ graphics card, so gaming efficiency is unquestionably the place I spent most of my time testing the RTX 4070. I need to observe that the included figures listed below are a consultant pattern of my testing, and that not all check outcomes are proven.
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
No RT, No DLSS |
RT, No DLSS |
RT, DLSS |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
96 (57 min) |
76 (48 min) |
88 (54 min) |
|
RX 7900 XT |
99 (60 min) |
66 (46 min) |
DLSS not avaliable |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
80 (50 min) |
67 (43 min) |
DLSS didn’t interact |
|
RTX 3080 |
79 (47 min) |
61 (40 min) |
72 (46 min) |
|
RTX 4070 |
77 (47 min) |
59 (38 min) |
70 (45 min) |
|
RTX 3070 |
62 (37 min) |
46 (30 min) |
55 (35 min) |
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
No RT, No DLSS |
RT, No DLSS |
RT, DLSS |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
66 (43 min) |
45 (32 min) |
53 (36 min) |
|
RX 7900 XT |
69 (46 min) |
36 (27 min) |
DLSS not avaliable |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
67 (44 min) |
22 (15 min) |
59 (40 min) |
|
RTX 3080 |
55 (35 min) |
35 (24 min) |
61 (40 min) |
|
RTX 4070 |
33 (21 min) |
17 (13 min) |
38 (26 min) |
On the subject of gaming efficiency, the RTX 4070 gives a number of the finest you are going to get at this value, although there are some stipulations to convey up proper out the gate.
First, broadly talking, this card can recreation at 4K on most video games not referred to as Cyberpunk 2077 or Metro: Exodus utilizing max settings natively, as long as you retain issues inside cheap limits. Or, actually, one restrict: hold ray tracing turned off.
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
1080p |
1440p |
2160p |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
288 (240 min) |
241 (205 min) |
156 (130 min) |
|
RX 7900 XT |
321 (258 min) |
250 (203 min) |
170 (139 min) |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
264 (228 min) |
247 (215 min) |
115 (88 min) |
|
RTX 3080 |
236 (204 min) |
198 (169 min) |
130 (110 min) |
|
RTX 4070 |
259 (230 min) |
204 (170 min) |
136 (116 min) |
|
RTX 3070 |
180 (154 min) |
143 (125 min) |
91 (79 min) |
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
1080p |
1440p |
2160p |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
173 (159 min) |
109 (93 min) |
56 (48 min) |
|
RX 7900 XT |
147 (118 min) |
103 (78 min) |
55 (41 min) |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
138 (120 min) |
93 (79 min) |
45 (32 min) |
|
RTX 3080 |
126 (109 min) |
86 (73 min) |
44 (37 min) |
|
RTX 4070 |
127 (108 min) |
85 (73 min) |
48 (40 min) |
|
RTX 3070 |
91 (78 min) |
60 (51 min) |
30 (25 min) |
Total, the RTX 4070 will get about 58 fps on common at 4K when not ray tracing, with a flooring of 45 fps at 4K, which is eminently playable. Flip ray tracing to the max and your get a mean fps of 34 with a flooring of 25, which is simply higher than a slideshow.
The RTX 3080 would not fare too a lot better on this metric, managing 40 fps on common with a flooring of 29 fps at max settings with ray tacing turned on, whereas the RTX 3080 Ti averages about 36 fps and a flooring of 19 fps. This does put the RTX 4070 simply behind the 3080 Ti when it comes to common fps and with a better fps flooring than the 3080 Ti.
If you happen to’re useless set on ray tracing, the RTX 4070 can actually ship, because of DLSS, which may bump these numbers again as much as 79 fps on common with a flooring of 55 fps. Evaluate that to the RTX 3080’s 80 fps common with a 58 fps flooring in our checks and the RTX 4070 can positively go toe to toe with the RTX 3080 when ray tracing on max settings if DLSS is on.
As well as, the RTX 4070 will get about 10% much less fps on common than the RTX 3080 Ti at 4K with ray tracing and DLSS on, (79 fps to the 3080 Ti’s 88 fps), and a roughly 14% decrease fps flooring than the RTX 3080 Ti (55 fps to the 3080 Ti’s 64 fps).
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
1080p |
1440p |
2160p |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
111 (90 min) |
66 (51 min) |
29 (21 min) |
|
RX 7900 XT |
128 (53 min) |
79 (58 min) |
34 (27 min) |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
104 (83 min) |
63 (50 min) |
29 (22 min) |
|
RTX 3080 |
94 (76 min) |
57 (45 min) |
26 (20 min) |
|
RTX 4070 |
85 (69 min) |
48 (37 min) |
19 (15 min) |
|
RTX 3070 |
73 (60 min) |
44 (37 min) |
19 (15 min) |
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
1080p |
1440p |
2160p |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
74 (56 min) |
47 (35 min) |
19 (14 min) |
|
RX 7900 XT |
49 (37 min) |
31 (24 min) |
15 (11 min) |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
63 (49 min) |
41 (30 min) |
18 (11 min) |
|
RTX 3080 |
58 (45 min) |
37 (27 min) |
15 (8 min) |
|
RTX 4070 |
57 (44 min) |
35 (27 min) |
15 (8 min) |
|
RTX 3070 |
41 (14 min) |
25 (11 min) |
4 (2 min) |
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
High quality |
Extremely Efficiency |
|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
43 (33 min) |
100 (82 min) |
|
RX 7900 XT |
28 (22 min) |
69 (54 min) |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
38 (29 min) |
83 (68 min) |
|
RTX 3080 |
34 (25 min) |
74 (60 min) |
|
RTX 4070 |
32 (26 min) |
76 (62 min) |
|
RTX 3070 Ti |
18 (11 min) |
54 (19 min) |
|
RTX 3070 |
23 (13 min) |
52 (12 min) |
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
High quality |
Extremely Efficiency |
|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
60 (17 min) |
127 (84 min) |
|
RTX 4070 |
58 (15 min) |
99 (62 min) |
Total, the RTX 4070 manages a mean 57 fps at 4K, with a flooring of 41 fps, throughout all of the settings I examined. That is about 28% decrease than the RTX 4070 Ti (79 fps common, total), about 10% decrease than the RTX 3080 (63 fps common, total), the RX 7900 XT (64 fps common, total), and the RTX 3080 Ti (64 fps common, total).
These numbers skew a bit towards the RTX 4070, because the RTX 4070 Ti, RX 7900 XT, RTX 3080, and RTX 3080 Ti all deal with native 4K gaming a lot better, however so few individuals play at native 4K anymore that could be a pretty meaningless benefit.
In the meantime, the RTX 4070 truly beats the RX 7900 XT by about 20% when utilizing DLSS (versus the RX 7900 XT’s FSR) at 4K with max settings and ray tracing; 79 fps on common to 66 fps on common, respectively. It additionally manages to strike a useless warmth with the RTX 3080 (80 fps common) and are available simply 10% wanting the RTX 3080 Ti’s common RT efficiency at 4K with ray tracing.
It is essential to notice as nicely that these do not think about DLSS 3 Body Technology, to make it a good comparability.
As for the RTX 3070, the RTX 4070 manages about 39% higher common 4K efficiency, with a 53% greater fps flooring (57 fps common with a 43 fps flooring for the RTX 4070 in comparison with the RTX 3070’s 41 fps common and 28 fps flooring).
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
1080p |
1440p |
2160p |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
167 (79 min) |
124 (70 min) |
74 (45 min) |
|
RX 7900 XT |
152 (71 min) |
128 (78 min) |
74 (36 min) |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
136 (65 min) |
109 (68 min) |
69 (47 min) |
|
RTX 3080 |
128 (65 min) |
100 (48 min) |
63 (41 min) |
|
RTX 4070 |
131 (76 min) |
101 (65 min) |
59 (39 min) |
|
RTX 3070 |
103 (62 min) |
78 (39 min) |
42 (12 min) |
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
1080p |
1440p |
2160p |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
136 (87 min) |
99 (47 min) |
55 (36 min) |
|
RX 7900 XT |
102 (60 min) |
78 (55 min) |
45 (31 min) |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
113 ( 87 min) |
85 (45 min) |
50 (31 min) |
|
RTX 3080 |
104 (53 min) |
78 (43 min) |
45 (27 min) |
|
RTX 4070 |
109 (63 min) |
76 (54 min) |
52 (30 min) |
|
RTX 3070 |
80 (45 min) |
55 (16 min) |
12 (4 min) |
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
High quality |
Extremely Efficiency |
|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
84 (57 min) |
138 (75 min) |
|
RX 7900 XT |
63 (42 min) |
102 (53 min) |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
74 (46 min) |
120 (77 min) |
|
RTX 3080 |
69 (47 min) |
110 (64 min) |
|
RTX 4070 |
65 (43 min) |
113 (75 min) |
|
RTX 3070 |
22 (8 min) |
85 (49 min) |
On the subject of 1440p gaming, the RTX 4070 is on rather more strong footing, even when a number of the greater playing cards positively carry out higher in absolute phrases. The RTX 4070 underperforms the RTX 3080 by about 8% in non-ray-traced, non-upscaled 1440p gaming, on common (105 fps to the RTX 3080’s 115 fps), although they each have a really related flooring round 80-85 fps.
In the meantime, the RTX 4070 falls about 12% wanting the RTX 3080 Ti’s 119 common fps at non-ray-traced, non-DLSS 1440p.
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
1080p |
1440p |
2160p |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
360 (266 min) |
258 (194 min) |
137 (100 min) |
|
RX 7900 XT |
182 (125 min) |
125 (95 min) |
66 (55 min) |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
173 (135 min) |
125 (100 min) |
70 (57 min) |
|
RTX 3080 |
160 (128 min) |
114 (92 min) |
64 (52 min) |
|
RTX 4070 |
156 (124 min) |
107 (91 min) |
56 (47 min) |
|
RTX 3070 |
120 (93 min) |
77 (61 min) |
38 (30 min) |
Each the RTX 4070 Ti and RX 7900 XT kinda clobber the RTX 4070 with roughly 25-29% higher efficiency at non-ray-traced, non-upscaled 1440p gaming, and this carries over into gaming with ray tracing settings maxed out, although the RTX 4070 remains to be getting north of 60 fps on common (67 fps, to be exact), with a comparatively respectable flooring of 51 fps.
The actual kicker although is once we activate DLSS, at which level the RTX 4070 beats out every little thing however the RTX 4070 Ti and RTX 3080 Ti, together with the RX 7900 XT, which it outperforms by about 29% on common (125 fps to 97 fps), with a a lot greater flooring of 88 fps to the RX 7900 XT’s 60 fps, an almost 49% benefit.
The RTX 4070 additionally beats the RTX 3080 right here too, with about 5% higher efficiency on common and a 7.5% greater fps flooring on common than the RTX 3080. Extremely, the RTX 4070 is simply 3% slower than the RTX 3080 Ti when each are utilizing DLSS at 1440p with max ray tracing.
As for the RTX 3070, the RTX 4070 will get about 35% higher efficiency at 1440p with ray tracing and DLSS 2.0 than the cardboard it replaces (125 fps to 93 fps), with an almost 53% greater fps flooring on common (87 fps to the 3070’s 57 fps), that means that the place the RTX 3070 is setting the 1440p customary, the RTX 4070 is blowing nicely previous it into territory the RTX 3070 merely can’t go.
The story is just about the identical at 1080p, with there being primarily no distinction between the RTX 4070, the RTX 3080, the RTX 3080 Ti, and the RX 7900 XT, with the RTX 3070 languishing about 30% behind and the RTX 4070 Ti off by itself out forward of everybody else.
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
1080p |
1440p |
2160p |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
173 (123 min) |
131 (91 min) |
79 (58 min) |
|
RX 7900 XT |
139 (92 min) |
106 (74 min) |
64 (46 min) |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
136 (95 min) |
108 (77 min) |
64 (40 min) |
|
RTX 3080 |
138 (96 min) |
103 (73 min) |
63 (47 min) |
|
RTX 4070 |
136 (93 min) |
99 (73 min) |
57 (43 min) |
|
RTX 3070 |
108 (75 min) |
77 (51 min) |
41 (28 min) |
There was a number of speak in regards to the RTX 4070 forward of its launch as benchmarks have leaked and folks have checked out numbers out of context and downplayed the efficiency of the RTX 4070 primarily based on one or two checks. They’ve even pointed to the value enhance to say that this card is a disappointment.
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
Min | Max Temp |
Min | Max Energy Draw |
|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
25.0°C / 65.0°C |
7.19W / 274.75W |
|
RX 7900 XT |
55.0°C / 71.0°C |
78.0W / 313.0W |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
38.1°C / 53.6°C |
22.440W / 352.912W |
|
RTX 3080 |
34.7°C / 65.8°C |
20.724W / 327.456W |
|
RTX 4070 |
31.7°C / 68.0°C |
11.359W / 202.784W |
|
RTX 3070 |
32.9°C / 72.7°C |
16.57W / 227.433W |
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
Last total rating |
Perf. per Watt |
Perf. per MSRP |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
15,620 |
56.85 |
19.55 |
|
RX 7900 XT |
16,772 |
53.58 |
18.66 |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
14,251 |
40.38 |
11.89 |
|
RTX 3080 |
13,581 |
41.47 |
19.43 |
|
RTX 4070 |
13,398 |
66.07 |
22.37 |
|
RTX 3070 |
11,015 |
48.43 |
22.07 |
Granted, I am not thrilled in regards to the 20% value enhance both, however there isn’t any getting round the truth that you are getting a graphics card right here with simply 200W TGP that is placing up numbers to rival the RTX 3080 Ti. And I have never even touched on the brand new options packed into Lovelace which you could’t get with the last-gen Nvidia graphics cards.
The numbers are what they’re, and the RTX 4070’s efficiency is solely excellent throughout each decision in all of the ways in which matter.
Must you purchase the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 ?
|
Attributes |
Notes |
Ranking |
|---|---|---|
|
Worth |
Whereas 20% dearer than the cardboard it replaces, its efficiency greater than justifies its value. |
4 / 5 |
|
Options & chipset |
TSMC’s 5nm course of, mature RT and Tensor cores, and 50% extra VRAM than the RTX 3070 add as much as a hell of a graphics card. |
5 / 5 |
|
Design |
Just like the RTX 4080, however smaller and extra manageable, save for the 16-pin energy cable that is arguably pointless. |
4.5 / 5 |
|
Efficiency |
Nice 4K gaming efficiency and respectable inventive efficiency as nicely, all for 200W energy draw. |
5 / 5 |
|
Complete |
Row 4 – Cell 1 |
4.625 / 5 |
Purchase it if…
Do not buy it if…
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 assessment: Additionally contemplate
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Worth: |
$599 (about £525 / AU$870) |
$799 / £799 / AU$1479 |
$899 / £899 / AU$1,619 |
|
Increase Clock |
2,475MHz |
2,610MHz |
2,394MHz |
|
VRAM |
12GB GDDR6X |
12GB GDDR6X |
20GB GDDR6 |
|
Reminiscence Bandwidth |
504.2 GB/s |
504.2 GB/s |
800.0 GB/s |
|
Streaming Multiprocessors |
5,888 |
7,680 |
5,376 |
|
Ray Tracing Cores |
46 |
60 |
84 |
|
Tensor Cores |
184 |
240 |
N/A |
|
Connector |
1 x 16-pin |
1 x 16-pin |
2 x 8-pin |
|
Outputs |
1 x HDMI 2.1, 3 x DisplayPort 1.4b |
1 x HDMI 2.1 3 x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1 x HDMI 2.1a, 2 x DisplayPort 2.1, 1 x USB Kind-C |
If our Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 assessment has you contemplating different choices, listed below are two extra graphics playing cards to think about…
How I examined the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
- I spent about 50 hours with the RTX 4070 in complete
- Apart from basic benchmarking, I used the cardboard for on a regular basis gaming and inventive work
My check bench specs
Right here is the techniques I used to check the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070:
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
CPU Cooler: Cougar Poseidon GT 360 AIO Cooler
DDR5 RAM: 32GB Corsair Dominator Platinum @ 5,200MHz & 32GB G.Talent Trident Z5 Neo @ 5,200MHz
Motherboard: ASRock X670E Taichi
SSD: Samsung 980 Professional SSD @ 1TB
Energy Provide: Corsair AX1000 80-Plus Titanium (1000W) Case: Praxis Wetbench
Once I check a graphics card, I begin by ensuring that every one checks are carried out on the identical check bench setup to isolate GPU efficiency. I then run it via a sequence of artificial benchmarking instruments like 3DMark in addition to in-game benchmarks in the newest PC video games I can entry like Cyberpunk 2077 and F1 2022.
I run every little thing on the utmost settings doable with out upscaling tech, and I run all checks on the decision a reader is most probably to make use of a given card at. Within the case of the RTX 4070, this meant testing at 1080p, 1440p, and 2160p.
I additionally ensure that to put in the most recent related drivers and rerun checks on any competing graphics card that I might need already reviewed and examined, just like the RTX 4070 Ti, RX 7900 XT, and RTX 3080 to make it possible for I’ve probably the most present scores to account for any driver updates. All of those scores are recorded and in contrast towards the cardboard’s predecessor, its most direct rival, and the cardboard straight above and beneath it within the product stack, if these playing cards can be found.
I then common these scores to come back to a remaining total rating and divide that by the cardboard’s MSRP to see how a lot efficiency each greenback or pound spent truly will get you to seek out how a lot worth the cardboard truly brings to the desk.
Lastly, I truly use the cardboard in my very own private pc for a number of days, enjoying video games, utilizing apps like Adobe Photoshop or Adobe Illustrator, and expecting any anomalies, crashes, glitches, or visible disruptions that will happen throughout my time with the cardboard. Having extensively coated and examined many graphics playing cards over time, I do know what a graphics card ought to do and the way it ought to carry out, and may readily determine when one thing just isn’t performing as much as expectations and when it exceeds them.
First reviewed April 2023