TopRatedTech

Tech News, Gadget Reviews, and Product Analysis for Affiliate Marketing

TopRatedTech

Tech News, Gadget Reviews, and Product Analysis for Affiliate Marketing

Reusable rockets are here, so why is NASA paying more to launch stuff to space?

• 1998: Deep House 1 Delta II rocket — $86 million

• 1999: Mars Polar Lander Delta II rocket — $88 million

• 2001: Mars Odyssey Delta II rocket — $96 million

• 2003: Spirit and Alternative Mars rovers — two Delta II rockets — $87 million per launch

• 2004: Swift Delta II rocket — $90 million

• 2005: Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Atlas V rocket — $147 million

• 2007: Phoenix Mars lander — Delta II rocket — $132 million

Launch costs for NASA missions soared after the late 2000s, following the creation of United Launch Alliance by a merger of the Atlas and Delta rocket packages developed by Lockheed Martin and Boeing. The merger eradicated competitors for many of NASA’s launch contracts till SpaceX’s Falcon 9 turned obtainable for NASA science missions within the mid-2010s. Here is a pattern of missions as examples of the rising prices, with contract values adjusted for inflation from the time of their award to replicate 2025 {dollars}:

• 2009: Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter — Atlas V rocket — $220 million

• 2012: Radiation Belt Storm Probes — Atlas V rocket — $226 million (averaged from a bulk purchase)

• 2014: Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 — Delta II rocket — $191 million (averaged from a bulk purchase)

• 2016: OSIRIS-REx asteroid mission — Atlas V rocket — $252 million

• 2017: TDRS-M information relay satellite tv for pc — Atlas V rocket — $179 million

• 2017: JPSS-2 climate satellite tv for pc — Atlas V rocket — $224 million

• 2018: InSight Mars lander — Atlas V rocket — $220 million

• 2018: ICESAT-2 — Delta II rocket — $134 million

Once more, the missions listed above would seemingly launch on SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets if NASA awarded these contracts right now. So, how do SpaceX’s more moderen Falcon 9 costs evaluate? Let’s have a look. These contract values are adjusted for inflation from the time of their award to replicate 2025 {dollars}:

• 2016: Jason 3 oceanography satellite tv for pc — Falcon 9 rocket — $114 million

• 2018: Transiting Exoplanets Survey Satellite tv for pc — Falcon 9 rocket — $118 million

• 2020: Sentinel-6A — Falcon 9 rocket — $126 million

• 2021: Double Asteroid Redirection Check — Falcon 9 rocket — $86 million

• 2021: Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer — Falcon 9 rocket — $62 million

• 2022: Floor Water and Ocean Topography — Falcon 9 rocket — $148 million

• 2024: PACE Earth sciences mission — Falcon 9 rocket — $99 million

• 2025: SPHEREx astronomy mission — Falcon 9 rocket — $99 million

And listed below are just a few future launches NASA has booked to fly on SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket. A few of these contracts had been awarded within the final 12 months, and people haven’t been adjusted for inflation. The others replicate 2025 {dollars}:

• 2025: Interstellar Mapping and Acceleration Probe — Falcon 9 rocket — $134 million

• 2025: Sentinel-6B — Falcon 9 rocket — $101 million

• 2027: NEO Surveyor — Falcon 9 rocket — $100 million

• 2027: JPSS-4 climate satellite tv for pc — Falcon 9 rocket — $113 million

• 2027: Compton Spectrometer and Imager — Falcon 9 rocket — $69 million

There are just a few different issues value noting once we chart NASA’s launch costs. One is that SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy, used for NASA’s heaviest missions, prices greater than a Falcon 9 rocket. For instance, two similar climate satellites launched in 2022 and 2024 on ULA’s Atlas V and SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy rocket for $207 million and $178 million, respectively, once more adjusted for inflation.

Source link

Reusable rockets are here, so why is NASA paying more to launch stuff to space?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to top